Victoria Marie Weston and Marie Beatrice Weston v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Circuit Judge:
The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (‘WMATA”) appeals from a judgment following a jury verdict finding that WMATA was negligent per se in the inspection and maintenance of its escalators, which proximately caused a hand injury to the two-year old plaintiff. WMATA makes seven claims of error on appeal, but we need only address its contention that the district court erred in instructing the jury on the meaning of § 902.5 of the D.C. Elevator Code. Although framed in terms of an error of interpretation, WMATA’s contention necessarily presents the court with…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- T I Federal Credit Union v. DelBonisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Marx & Co. v. Diners' Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Ernest J. Saviano and Margaret Saviano v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Martin v. George Hyman Construction Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Eduardo Burkhart v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- United States v. TeeterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Guilford Transportation Industries, Inc. v. WilnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- In Re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Mahnke v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.