Legal Opinion
United States v. Boyance
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 20, 1962No. Crim. No. 20914PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DUSEN, District Judge.
An indictment was returned against defendant Markley and seven other defendants which charges in Count I that the defendants conspired to violate 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 472 and 473, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 371.1 There are 13 overt acts set forth under Count I which are alleged to have been done in furtherance of the conspiracy and to effect the objects, designs and purposes of said conspiracy. Defendant Markley is mentioned as having participated in two of the “Overt Acts” which are set forth in this Count of the indictment. Counts II-V of the indictment charge two of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Delli Paoli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Stilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Dauer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- United States v. Peter Postma and Joseph P. McConnon and Nicholas RobilottoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. LernerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1973
- United States v. ClarkDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- United States v. HaimDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- United States v. SteelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965