Legal Opinion

Lindback v. Milter

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 12, 1934No. 5232PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.

This suit is on a written contract between the parties wherein, as the plaintiff construes it, the defendant engaged to pay him a salary through a term of years as manager in the manufacture and sale of a certain product. Confessing the contract, the defendant construes it as a mere convenience, or a “conduit,” entered into until he (the defend'ant) should determine what corporation (a new one to be organized for the purpose or an old one conveniently available) should make and sell the product and, accordingly, until the corporation, so selected, should take over the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilmoth v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1904
  2. Stone v. ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  3. Foster v. Berg & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Joseph P. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API