Zoning Commission of Town of Danbury v. Grandieri
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtDiCenzo, J.
The finding, with such corrections as the appellant is entitled to, discloses the following factual situation.
On September 1, 1960, the zoning commission of the town of Danbury adopted zoning regulations which created certain classes of districts, among which was a class entitled “Rural Districts — RU.” The purpose of “Rural Districts — RU” was to provide, in areas slightly less favorable for dense development, districts where traditional rural occupations can be subjected to a minimum of restriction, and also to reduce the density of the residential pattern where soil and topographic…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McAdams v. BarbieriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Service Realty Corporation v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Rathbun v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Garbaty v. Norwalk Jewish Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Park Construction Co. v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kaeser v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Foster Village Community Ass'n v. HessHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983