Legal Opinion

La Fetra v. Gleason

California Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1894No. 19204PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order refusing to set aside a default. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

This action was brought to foreclose a mortgage executed by plaintiff to defendant Gleason upon certain land in California. The defendant, Charles Ingles, and a number of other persons were made parties defendant upon the general averment that they claim to have some interest in the mortgaged premises, which interest is averred to be subsequent and subject to the lien of said mortgage. Judgment by default was rendered against all of the defendants, and a decree of foreclosure entered in favor of plaintiff. Defendant Ingles appeals from the judgment. He also appeals from an order denying his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Matter of the Estate Op Bernard NewManCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Estate of DamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Lindley v. LindleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. María Arrarás v. María ArzuagaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1938
  4. Ridgway v. SalrinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Arrarás v. ArzuagaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API