Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Ozan Lumber Company

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 7, 1949No. 4-8959PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.

This litigation is between the holder of an unrecorded timber deed and the subsequent purchaser of the land. The controlling question is whether such purchaser had notice of the timber deed prior to his acquisition of the land. The law on the point is well settled. In Millman Lumber Co. v. Bryant, 213 Ark. 277, 209 S. W. 2d 878 we reviewed many of our earlier cases, and quoted with approval the rule stated in Devlin on Real Estate, 3rd Ed., § 725:

“ ‘It is a well settled rule, both in England and in this country, that subsequent purchasers who have notice of a prior…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Murphy v. OsborneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  2. Millman Lumber Co. v. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Killam v. Texas Oil & Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Walls v. HumphriesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  3. Woods v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  4. Bowen v. PerrymanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  5. Rice v. Welch Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API