Legal Opinion

May Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. F. & W. Grand 5-10-25 Cent Stores, Inc.

District Court, D. Montana

Decided May 18, 1932No. 1301PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOURQUIN, District Judge.

March 22, 3932, in the clerk’s office counsel filed complaint and answer, and, presenting them to the court with an order-form, applied for ancillary receivers, preferably those three days before appointed in original proceedings in the Southern District of New York. In addition wa,s a rejected tender of some letter and information the like ancillary presently had been or would be sought and granted in some forty federal districts wherein are located some one or more of defendant’s more than one hundred stores. The complaint, by a simple contract creditor in behalf of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Harkin v. BrundageSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Lord v. VeazieSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  3. Re Metropolitan Railway ReceivershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Cleveland v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  5. Hardy v. North Butte Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. May Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  2. In Re JeppsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1986
  3. In Re Insull Utility Investments, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1933
  4. Montgomery & Crawford, Inc. v. Arcadia MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API