Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. v. Roesch

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Application for a writ of mandamus. . The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

The relator, being 'sued for negligence jointly with another defendant in the Municipal Court, made a motion for the removal of the cause to the City Court, and duly filed an undertaking, in which motion and undertaking the codefendant did not join. The justice held that he had no power to make such direction, and this application, is for a mandamus to Compel such removal. Such writ, however, will not issue when there is an adequate remedy by appeal. People ex rel. Wright v. Coffin, 7 Hun, 608, 609; Clark v. Miller, 54 N. Y. 528, 534; People v. R. R. Co., 63 How. Pr. 291, 296. That this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ward v. ArredondoU.S. Circuit Court for New York · 1825
  2. Smith v. RinesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1836
  3. Clark v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Beardsley v. TorreyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania · 1822
  5. Hogan v. DevlinNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1867

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Goldstein v. BolteNew York Supreme Court · 1900
  2. People ex rel. Keyser v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API