Ex Parte Judd
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
694 So.2d 1294 (1997)
Ex parte Ernest Randy JUDD.
(Re Ernest Randy Judd v. State.)
1950078.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
April 25, 1997.
Herman Watson, Jr., and Charles H. Pullen, of Watson, Fees & Jimmerson, P.C., Huntsville, for petitioner.
Bill Pryor, Atty. Gen., and Margaret S. Childers, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
2Per curiam
This Court granted Ernest Randy Judd's petition for the writ of certiorari to consider his argument that his conviction was had in violation of his right to a public trial as guaranteed under Article I, § 6, of the Alabama Constitution of 1901 and the Sixth Amendment to the United…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited22 opinions
- In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Estes v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Twining v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Adamson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- Judd v. HaleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Ex Parte EasterwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Demouey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2015
- Ernest Randy Judd v. Michael W. HaleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- P.M.M. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.