Legal Opinion

Hughan v. Grimes

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 6, 1900No. 11,695PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Atchison district court; W. T. Bland, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

This is another controversy which has grown out of the contest of the Grimes will and of the settlement of the Grimes estate. The history of the litigation has been stated in the reports of prior adjudications. (Hudson v. Hughan, 56 Kan. 152, 42 Pac. *259701; Hudson v. Barratt, ante, p. 137, 61 Pac. 737.) When the will was adjudged to be invalid by the district court and the case brought to this court for review, an order staying execution of the judgment and all proceedings in the trial court was asked for and allowed, upon the giving of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hudson v. BarrattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  2. Avery v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Hudson v. HughanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  4. Mulvane v. TullockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  5. Rhodes v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Town of Seaford v. Eastern Shore Public Service Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1942
  2. Cook v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API