Legal Opinion

Shell Oil Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 3, 1956No. 59875; protest 135145-K (New York)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This protest involves a commodity bearing the trade name “Teepol,” which was assessed with duty at the rate of 25 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 37 of the Tariff Act of 1930, for “esters of all kinds not specially provided for.” Plaintiffs’ original claim was for classification of the merchandise as soap, under paragraph 80 of the Tariff Act of 1930, carrying a dutiable rate of 15 per centum ad valorem.

The case was the subject of our decision in Shell Oil Co., Inc., et al. v. United States, 30 Cust. Ct. 180, C. D. 1517, wherein we held that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kachurin Drug Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  2. Shell Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  3. United States v. Rhodia Chemical Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API