Legal Opinion

United States v. Rhodia Chemical Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 13, 1922No. 2164PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Merchandise known as acetol imported at the port of New York was classified by the collector of customs as a compound of “other cellulose esters,” and was assessed for duty at 25 per cent ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 25 of the act of 1913, which paragraph in so far as pertinent to the case reads as follows:

Par. 25. * * * compounds of pyroxylin or of other cellulose esters, whether known as celluloid or by any other name, * * * 25 per centum ad valorem.

The importer protested that the goods were not compounds of cellulose esters and claimed that the importation was dutiable at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davies v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Herrman v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Strakosh v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. United States v. Danker & MarstonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shell Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API