Legal Opinion

Stabrow v. Stabrow

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 6, 1949No. 3877PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.

The defendant’s motion for a nonsuit (correctly a motion to dismiss, and so treated) was properly denied and his exception thereto must be overruled. In passing upon this motion, the Court was obliged to consider the evidence for the plaintiff as true and to construe it most favorably to the plaintiff. Shimkus v. Caesar, 95 N. H. 286, 287.

The plaintiff testified that, shortly after the burial of his mother, the defendant came and rapped on the door of plaintiff’s home one morning, woke him up, and came upstairs to his bedroom. The defendant was excited over money he had found, stating that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bennett v. LaroseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  2. Leavitt v. BaconSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
  3. Condiles v. Waumbec Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1948
  4. Shimkus v. CaesarSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1948
  5. Lamkin v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1903

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. MartignettiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API