Legal Opinion

B. Kuppenheimer & Co., Inc. v. Kayser-Roth Corporation

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 23, 1964No. Patent Appeal 7076PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, 134 USPQ 465, sustaining an opposition to an application by appellant, B. Kuppenheimer & Co., for the registration of as a trademark for men’s and boys’ pants. Use of the mark in interstate commerce *821by appellant on the designated goods since February 1959 is alleged.

Appellee, Kayser-Roth Corporation, is the registrant of SUPP-HOSE for hosiery.1

Mr. Austin Marvin Mark, assistant to appellee’s vice president, testified that SUPP-HOSE was first used by a predecessor of appellee on August 12,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Celanese Corp. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Krim-Ko Corporation (Krim-Ko Division, the National Sugar Refining Company) v. The Coca-Cola Bottling Company of New York, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  2. Dena Corporation v. Belvedere International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  3. B. Kuppenheimer & Co., Inc. v. Kayser-Roth CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  4. LEGO Juris A/S, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2022
  5. Lego Juris A/S, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API