Legal Opinion

(PC) Carr v. Cueva

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 21, 2025No. 2:24-cv-01680Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PAUL DAVID CARR, No. 2:24-cv-1680 DJC AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 CUEVA, et al, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state inmate who filed this civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

18 without a lawyer. He has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 12. 19 In screening the original complaint, the undersigned gave plaintiff the option to proceed 20 on his cognizable claim against defendant Dr. Dail or amend the complaint. ECF No. 12 at 3-5. 21 Plaintiff elected to amend…

2Cases cited79 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API