Legal Opinion
R&B, Inc. v. Needa Parts Manufacturing, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 20, 2002No. 01-3411UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
This is an appeal from the District Court’s denial of a preliminary injunction. Because we write for the parties only, we do not set out the background of this case. 1
R&B challenges the denial of the preliminary injunction on primarily two grounds. First, R&B argues that its part numbers satisfy the requirements for copyright protection and that its copyrighted catalogue was infringed by Needa such that it showed a likelihood of success on the merits of its copyright infringement claim. Second, R&B argues that there is a likelihood of confusion between the Need! and Needa?…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Opticians Ass'n of America v. Independent Opticians of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- A&h Sportswear, Inc Mainstream Swimsuits, Inc. v. Victoria's Secret Stores, Inc. Victoria's Secret Catalogue, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Interpace Corporation v. Lapp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Pappan Enterprises, Inc. v. Hardee's Food Systems, Inc. Mro Mid-Atlantic Corp. v. Louis D. Pappan Panagiota PappanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- R&B, Inc. v. Needa Parts Manufacturing, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005