Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of O'Connor
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided May 23, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
The question presently propounded is as to whether a referee appointed by the surrogate “ to hear and determine all questions arising upon the settlement of said account, which the surrogate has power to determine, and to make a report thereon to this court,” is under obligation to make or pass upon specific findings of fact and conclusions of law. The respondent maintains the affirmative of this position and seeks a remission of the report of the referee, Edward J. Connolly, Esq., heretofore submitted herein, for this purpose.
*523The effect of a decision by a referee so appointed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Austin v. . AhearneNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Weyand v. . Park Terrace Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Swarthout v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of CarpenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Weyand v. The Park Terrace Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Estate of SielckenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
- In re the Estate of RoesslerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
- In re the Estate of GrubeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Accounting of LuckenbachNew York Surrogate's Court · 1947