Legal Opinion
Hughes v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided January 24, 1912No. 1271Published
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON REHEARING.
June 26, 1912.
PRENDERGAST, Judge.
By his motion for rehearing appellant again presents some of the questions decided against him in the original opinion herein.
Among others, he contends that the Act under which he was prosecuted in this case is unconstitutional, because in violation of that provision of our Bill of Bights, section 9, providing that “the people shall be secure in their persons, houses, papers and possessions from all unreasonable seizures or searches” . . . He cites only Ex parte Gould, 60 Texas Crim. Rep., 442, to sustain his contention. In the dissenting opinion…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Thurlow v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
- Beer Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Commonwealth v. BennettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- People v. ShulerMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.