Legal Opinion

Small v. Umatilla County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 11, 1997No. CV950714; CA A91109PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This case concerns a summary judgment in favor of defendant Kerns on plaintiffs claims of trespass and interference with economic relations. We affirm on plaintiffs appeal without discussion.

Defendant Kerns cross-appeals, assigning as error the trial court’s denial of sanctions, including attorney fees, pursuant to ORCP 17 C. The trial court denied defendant’s motion for sanctions without making any factual findings on this issue. Both plaintiff and defendant agree that such findings are required. Polizos v. Skoro, 129 Or App 51, 55-56,877 P2d 662, rev den 320 Or 271 (1994); Plere Publishers,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Plere Publishers, Inc. v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Polizos v. SkoroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Staten v. SteelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. Staten v. SteelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API