Northness v. Hillestad
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Polk county, Watts, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
This action was brought to recover the sum of $120.91 — -the proceeds of certain crops raised by plaintiffs, under the terms of a farm contract, upon land owned by defendant, and alleged to have been wrongfully converted by defendant to his own use. Plaintiffs had a verdict in the court below, and defendant appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
1. Taking the points made by appellant in an orderly way, we come first to the question whether the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. It alleges in general terms that the parties entered into an…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hedderly v. DownsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Smith v. ForceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Morish v. MountainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
3Cited by4 opinions
- Larson v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Semper v. CoatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Broussard v. Le BlancCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Olson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914