Comptroller of the Treasury v. American Cyanamid Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Dissent
Barnes, J.,
filed the following dissenting opinion.
The majority indicates in its opinion in this case that the text of its “judicial sermon” to the Comptroller is “But no practice, however generally, or however long it may have prevailed, can override the clear and manifest meaning of a statute.” In my opinion, if we are still constitutionally permitted to preach a judicial sermon — even to the Comptroller — the wrong text was selected and, perhaps the majority has even considered the wrong chapter. I suggest that the correct text would be:
“* * * [I]f there is no clear indication to the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Smith v. HiginbothomCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- Thomas v. Police CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Department of Tidewater Fisheries v. SollersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Wasena Housing Corp. v. LevayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- John McShain, Inc. v. ComptrollerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.