Legal Opinion

Henschel v. Clare County Road Commission

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided March 10, 2016No. Case No. 12-cv-11777Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON, United States District Judge

This case returns from the Sixth Circuit for reconsideration of Defendant Clare County Road Commission’s January 29, 2013 Motion for Summary Judgment. This Court granted that motion on April 26, 2013 and entered Judgment against Plaintiff Wayne Henschel. The opinion granting Defendant’s motion concluded that Hen-schel could not perform an essential function of his prior job as the operator of a construction excavator because he could not drive the automatic transmission semi-trucks that operator’s often…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. EchazabalSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API