Legal Opinion
GML, Inc. v. Cinque & Cinque, P.C.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 23, 2007PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question not answered on the ground that it is unnecessary.
Tennessee plaintiffs commenced this legal malpractice action against New York defendants, in which they assert that the Tennessee statute of limitations applies {see CPLR 202). Invoking Tennessee law, plaintiffs further assert that their claim should be tolled because of defendants’ absence from Tennessee. Defendants moved for summary judgment arguing that the matter was untimely. Supreme Court granted defendants’…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Insurance Co. of North America v. ABB Power Generation, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Childs v. BrandonNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
3Cited by11 opinions
- Portfolio Recovery Associates., LLC v. KingNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- Norex Petroleum Ltd. v. BlavatnikNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- Commerzbank AG v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG v. McGraw Hill Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Grynberg v. GiffenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.