Legal Opinion

Penton v. Royal Crown Bottling Co. of Chicago

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 1, 1994No. 93-3178PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We reverse the order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission that affirmed the appeals referee’s decision to deny unemployment compensation benefits, and remand for a new evidentiary hearing before the appeals *268referee. The record contains no indication that Penton, a route salesman for Royal Crown Bottling Company terminated for alleged failure to follow his supervisor’s directions to service certain customers, was on notice that whether complaints were made to his supervisor by customers on his route reflecting dissatisfaction with service would be an issue for determination at the hearing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alston v. ShiverSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  2. Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. HickmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Ogburn v. MurraySupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  4. Kline v. Belco, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. Montalbano v. Unemployment Appeals CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  3. Lopez v. A Aaron Super Rooter, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API