Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Lopez v. A Aaron Super Rooter, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 9, 2011No. 3D10-890Published

1ConcurrenceSalter, J.

I concur in my colleagues’ decision that the unemployment compensation appeals referee’s findings of fact are grounded on competent, substantial evidence, and that the controlling statutory provisions were correctly applied to that evidence by the referee and the Commission. I write only to express a concern about the manner in which the Agency for Workforce Innovation (Agency) provides record materials— *577or perhaps does not provide them — to the parties when an employee or employer appeals an adverse administrative determination.

In this ease, Mr. Lopez had worked for A Aaron Super Rooter,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Penton v. Royal Crown Bottling Co. of ChicagoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API