Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Little Rock Quarry Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 4, 1992No. 91-356Published

1Opinion of the Court

Donald L. Corbin, Justice.

The question presented in this case is whether the trial court applied the correct statute of limitations to an action against the appellant surety company on a construction bond issued to the Arkansas State Highway Commission.

Lamar Haddox, a now insolvent contractor, contracted with the Highway Commission to perform a construction project. The contract included a contract bond that Haddox executed with appellant United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (USF&G). Final payment on the construction contract was made on December 12, 1989.

This suit arose when Haddox…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  2. City of Hot Springs v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  3. State Ex Rel. Berry Asphalt Co. v. Western Surety Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API