Legal Opinion

People v. Kowalek

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1941No. Docket No. 114, Calendar No. 41,056PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, C. J.

Defendant was charged, tried and convicted of larceny by conversion as defined by Act No. 328, § 362, Pub. Acts 1931 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1940, §17115-362, Stat. Ann. §28.594).

It appears that sometime in October, 1936, Mike Fortelka, the complaining witness, answered an advertisement in a Bohemian newspaper resulting in defendant coming to Fortelka’s farm to act as his housekeeper. She remained there for about a week and then went away for a few days. Upon her return, she asked Fortelka how much money he had and was informed that he had $150 in cash and $300 in postal savings certificates. About…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Steudle v. Yellow & Checker Cab & Transfer Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Curth v. New York Life Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. People v. BeathMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. People v. EnglandMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. People v. HassellMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. WillisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. People v. InmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  3. People v. LombardoMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. People v. ReynoldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. People v. HarrisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API