People v. Kowalek
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, C. J.
Defendant was charged, tried and convicted of larceny by conversion as defined by Act No. 328, § 362, Pub. Acts 1931 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1940, §17115-362, Stat. Ann. §28.594).
It appears that sometime in October, 1936, Mike Fortelka, the complaining witness, answered an advertisement in a Bohemian newspaper resulting in defendant coming to Fortelka’s farm to act as his housekeeper. She remained there for about a week and then went away for a few days. Upon her return, she asked Fortelka how much money he had and was informed that he had $150 in cash and $300 in postal savings certificates. About…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Steudle v. Yellow & Checker Cab & Transfer Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Curth v. New York Life Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
- People v. BeathMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- People v. EnglandMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- People v. HassellMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. WillisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965
- People v. InmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. LombardoMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. ReynoldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. HarrisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.