People v. Hassell
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Oakland; Rockwell (Kleber P.), J. William F. Hassell was convicted of transporting intoxicating liquor in violation of Act No. 338, Pub. Acts 1917.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
(after stating the facts). In this court respondent contends:
1. That there was no delivery of the trunks to him. A sufficient answer to this contention is found in the fact that the point was not raised in the trial court nor is there any assignment of error covering it in this court.
2. It is next urged on behalf of the respondent that *239no evidence was offered by the people that the liquors were being transported for business or commercial use. Under this head it is argued that the seizure of the liquor in question could not be justified unless it was apparent that it was stored in a freight…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Calamari v. GraceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. LombardoMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. KowalekMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- People v. HeideMichigan Supreme Court · 1920