Legal Opinion

Phung v. Waste Management, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1986No. 84-1909Published

1DissentClifford F. Brown, J.

The court of appeals, by carving a public policy exception to the doctrine of at-will employment, would have had Ohio join what is already a clear majority of states which have carved similar exceptions, including the five states which border Ohio.1 Today, *105this court refuses to join that enlightened majority. I must vigorously disseht.

As noted in Judge Douglas’ well-reasoned opinion below, the doctrine of at-will employment developed in a laissez-faire climate that encouraged industrial growth and strongly approved an employer’s right to control his own business. That right necessarily…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Palmateer v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API