Legal Opinion

United States v. Clinton

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided February 26, 1970No. Crim. 31857PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUBIN, District Judge:

In this prosecution for refusing to submit to induction into the armed forces, defendant has fired a barrage against the indictment, seeking to strike it down on a number of grounds, including the alleged unconstitutionality of the Military Selective Service Act of 1967, 50 U.S.C.A. App. §§ 451-473, and of some of the Regulations promulgated thereunder, and alleging in addition the invalidity of several other Regulations and of the actions of his draft board. 1

Conscription is the means by which Congress — acting within its constitutional authority — has chosen to provide…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Giordano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Cassius Marsellus Clay, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  5. Michael Waldo Simmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rostker v. GoldbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. United States v. Gerald Dewayne McDuffieCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  3. United States v. YinglingDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Rostker v. GoldbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API