Legal Opinion
Milton S. Kronheim & Co. v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 24, 1995No. Civ. A. 95-0226-LFOPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
OBERDORFER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, an alcoholic beverage wholesaler licensed in the District of Columbia, seeks a preliminary injunction against defendants to prevent enforcement of a provision of the District of Columbia Wholesale Liquor Industry Storage Act of 1986 (the “Storage Act”) and a “come to rest” policy, both of which require plaintiff to maintain warehouse facilities in the District of Columbia. Plaintiff argues that any local warehousing requirement violates the Commerce Clause. After an evidentiary hearing on the motion on February 10, 1995, a ruling from the bench…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- United States v. MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Milton S. Kronheim & Company, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Harris v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Carbon Autonomous Robotic Systems Inc. v. Laudando & Assoc.District Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Harris v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Milton S. Kronheim & Company, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.