Legal Opinion

G.D. Searle & Co. v. Interstate Drug Exchange, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 14, 1987No. CV-85-1986 (MAC)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ALLYNE R. ROSS, United States Magistrate.

Plaintiffs, G.D. Searle & Co., Searle Pharmaceutical, Inc. and Searle & Co. (“Searle”) seek an order compelling defendant Marvin Sandler to answer questions posed to him at his deposition. In refusing to answer those questions, Sandler asserted a Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Plaintiffs urge that the questions, which pertain to Sandler’s prior activities in the so-called “diversion market” for .the American pharmaceutical industry, meet the test of relevance for purposes of civil discovery under Rule…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Zicarelli v. New Jersey State Commission of InvestigationSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Litton Industries, Inc. v. Lehman Bros. Kuhn LoebDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  2. Davidson Pipe Co. v. Laventhol & HorwathDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  3. Madanes v. MadanesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  4. Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. Endres (In Re Endres)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1989
  5. Shakman v. Democratic OrganizationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API