G.D. Searle & Co. v. Interstate Drug Exchange, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ALLYNE R. ROSS, United States Magistrate.
Plaintiffs, G.D. Searle & Co., Searle Pharmaceutical, Inc. and Searle & Co. (“Searle”) seek an order compelling defendant Marvin Sandler to answer questions posed to him at his deposition. In refusing to answer those questions, Sandler asserted a Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Plaintiffs urge that the questions, which pertain to Sandler’s prior activities in the so-called “diversion market” for .the American pharmaceutical industry, meet the test of relevance for purposes of civil discovery under Rule…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Zicarelli v. New Jersey State Commission of InvestigationSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Litton Industries, Inc. v. Lehman Bros. Kuhn LoebDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Davidson Pipe Co. v. Laventhol & HorwathDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Madanes v. MadanesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. Endres (In Re Endres)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1989
- Shakman v. Democratic OrganizationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.