Legal Opinion

State v. West

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 16, 2010No. COA09-851PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Robert C., Judge.

Defendant Daniel David West appeals his conviction for performing a notarial act without a commission. Defendant primarily contends that a violation of the pertinent statute requires multiple unau thorized “notarial acts.” Because the State’s evidence tends to show only a single unauthorized notarial act, defendant claims that the trial court erred in failing to dismiss the charge. Guided by our rules of statutory interpretation, we conclude that a violation of the statute requires only a single unauthorized notarial act, and, therefore, the trial court properly…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Dogwood Development & Management Co. LLC v. White Oak Transport Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2008

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re NTCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. In re N.T.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  3. Release of the Silk Plant Forest Citizen Review v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. SILK PLANT FOREST CITIZEN COMM. v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. State v. SchwendemanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API