State v. West
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUNTER, Robert C., Judge.
Defendant Daniel David West appeals his conviction for performing a notarial act without a commission. Defendant primarily contends that a violation of the pertinent statute requires multiple unau thorized “notarial acts.” Because the State’s evidence tends to show only a single unauthorized notarial act, defendant claims that the trial court erred in failing to dismiss the charge. Guided by our rules of statutory interpretation, we conclude that a violation of the statute requires only a single unauthorized notarial act, and, therefore, the trial court properly…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Dogwood Development & Management Co. LLC v. White Oak Transport Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re NTCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- In re N.T.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Release of the Silk Plant Forest Citizen Review v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- SILK PLANT FOREST CITIZEN COMM. v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. SchwendemanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014