Legal Opinion

Release of the Silk Plant Forest Citizen Review v. Barker

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 4, 2011No. COA10-1516PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Robert C., Judge.

Respondent police officers (“the officers” or “respondents”) appeal from the trial court’s 4 March 2010 order granting the City of Winston-Salem’s (“the City”) petition for disclosure of transcripts contained in respondents’ personnel files.1 Respondents argue on appeal that: (1) the trial court erred in granting the petition pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 160A-168(c)(4) (2009), and (2) disclosure of the transcripts would violate respondents’ privacy and liberty interests guaranteed under the 9th and 14th Amendments of the United States Constitution and Article I,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. PenningtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Wood v. J. P. Stevens & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Nance v. Southern RailwaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. In Re the Investigation Into the Injury of BrooksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. State v. DuboseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. SILK PLANT FOREST CITIZEN COMM. v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. Gray Media Grp., Inc. v. Town of MatthewsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026
  3. SCOTT v. THE CITY OF DURHAMDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API