Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nash v. City of Santa Monica

California Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1984No. L.A. 31798Published

1DissentMosk, J.

I dissent.

As Justice Frankfurter wrote in Bay Ridge Co. v. Aaron (1948) 334 U.S. 446, 484 [92 L.Ed. 1502, 1527, 68 S.Ct. 1186], “On the question you ask depends the answer you get.”

In this case if the question is whether a municipality may exercise its police power to reasonably regulate the rental business, the answer is: generally it may do so. But if the question is whether a city may compel a landlord to remain in business against his will, and give him only the alternative of a forced sale, the answer is: not in a democratic society.

The majority primarily consider the former question. In…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Hawaii Housing Authority v. MidkiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API