Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Fugazzi

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 1, 1965PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PALMORE, Judge.

Appellants instituted this declaratory judgment action in behalf of themselves and other taxpayers similarly situated, CR 23.01, to test the validity of a proposed method of financing a “Downtown Urban Renewal Project” in Lexington. The trial court received proof by depositions and entered judgment sustaining the city’s actions.

On April 1, 1965, the Board of Commissioners of Lexington adopted Ordinance No. 5144 describing an area in downtown Lexington and declaring it to be a blighted, deteriorated, or deteriorating area appropriate for an urban renewal project. KRS 99.530(1).…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fowler v. Obier, City Building InspectorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  2. Turnpike Authority of Kentucky v. WallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960
  3. Grimm v. MoloneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1962

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hayes v. State Property & Buildings CommissionKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
  2. South Hill Neighborhood Ass'n v. RomneyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  3. Prestonia Area Neighborhood Ass'n v. AbramsonKentucky Supreme Court · 1990
  4. South Hill Neighborhood Association v. RomneyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  5. Henn v. City of Highland HeightsDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API