Legal Opinion

The Pac. Fire Ins. Co. v. the Murdoch Cotton Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 14, 1936No. 4-4467PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.

The appellee, Murdoch. Cotton Company, was the owner of thirty-three bales of cotton which it had purchased from customers of the Smith Gin Company in October, 1935. This cotton was purchased while it was on the platform of the gin company and remained there preliminary to its delivery to the railroad for shipment. During this interval it was destroyed by fire and this action was instituted against the appellant, Pacific Fire Insurance Company, to recover its value plus penalty and'attorney’s fees. At the conclusion of the introduction of testimony, both parties moved for a directed verdict.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. California Insurance v. Union Compress Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Bertig v. NormanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  3. Home Insurance Co. of New York v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Strange v. Planters' Gin Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  5. Rollins v. East St. Louis Cotton Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1920

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. v. Republic National Bank of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. State v. Fairbanks North Star Borough School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  4. Penn v. COM. UNION FIRE INS. CO. OF NYMississippi Supreme Court · 1958
  5. United States v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API