Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Samkas v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1982No. 81-1687PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
R. C. 4123.57(C), after setting forth a schedule for compensation applicable to the loss of a thumb, fingers, or various portions thereof, provides, in pertinent part:
“If the claimant has suffered the loss of two or more fingers by amputation * * * and the nature of his employment * * * is such that the handicap or disability resulting from such loss of fingers, or loss of use of fingers, exceeds the normal handicap or disability resulting from such loss * * * the commission may take that fact into consideration and increase the award of compensation accordingly, but the award made in such…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Haines v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Reed v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- State ex rel. Vaughn v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- State, Ex Rel. Frank v. KellerOhio Court of Appeals · 1965
3Cited by10 opinions
- State ex rel. Roberts v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Republic-Franklin Insurance v. City of AmherstOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Cook v. ZimpherOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- State ex rel. Kirk v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.