Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Samkas v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1982No. 81-1687PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

R. C. 4123.57(C), after setting forth a schedule for compensation applicable to the loss of a thumb, fingers, or various portions thereof, provides, in pertinent part:

“If the claimant has suffered the loss of two or more fingers by amputation * * * and the nature of his employment * * * is such that the handicap or disability resulting from such loss of fingers, or loss of use of fingers, exceeds the normal handicap or disability resulting from such loss * * * the commission may take that fact into consideration and increase the award of compensation accordingly, but the award made in such…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Haines v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State ex rel. Reed v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State ex rel. Vaughn v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State, Ex Rel. Frank v. KellerOhio Court of Appeals · 1965

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Roberts v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Republic-Franklin Insurance v. City of AmherstOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State ex rel. Cook v. ZimpherOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State ex rel. Kirk v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API