Legal Opinion

Purdon v. Seligman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1889PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant for money had and received, the cause of action being the sale to plaintiff of worthless township bonds of Billings, Gladwin •county. These were sold to plaintiff in January, 1879. The suit was brought August 1, 1888,, nine years and a half thereafter. The defense was the statute of limitations, and this was sought to be avoided on the exception of section 8724, How. Stat., which allows suit within •two years after the discovery of a cause of action which *134has been “fraudulently concealed” from the knowledge of the party suing. The alleged fraud consisted in…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Daugherty v. Farmers Cooperative Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Scafidi v. Western Loan & Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Schram v. BurtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
  4. First National Bank v. SteelMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Ramsey v. Child, Hulswit & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API