Legal Opinion
State v. Craig
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided June 5, 1962No. 6902PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHAVEZ, Justice.
Appellant, H. W. Craig, was convicted by a jury of selling property which he did not own and which he had not been given the right to sell in violation of § 40-21^10, N.M.S.A., 1953 Comp. From the judgment and sentence he prosecutes this appeal.
Appellant, under a written contract, was purchasing a certain lot in Hobbs, New Mexico, upon which there was a frame house. Appellant had intended to construct a woodwork shop on the lot and attach it to the house. After purchasing the lot and frame building, appellant was unable to obtain a building permit to add to or extend the frame…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. BehrmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- People v. . FlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. ClarkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. AustinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- State v. LuceroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. PugaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. ElmquistNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.