Legal Opinion

Sconyers v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 13, 1909No. 2149PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Indictment for misdemeanor, from Tattnall superior court — ■ Judge Morgan presiding. August 11, 1909.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

1. The exceptions to the rulings upon the demurrers were not properly preserved pendente lite, and could- not be considered when offered as ground of the motion for new trial. Mayor &c. of Dublin v. Dudley, 2 Ga. App. 762 (59 S. E. 84).

2. The evidence, as well as the defendant’s statement, absolutely demanded the verdict finding that the defendant sold drugs without license; and hence the errors assigned are immaterial.

3. One may own a drug-store without being a licensed druggist or pharmacist, provided that the drugs and' medicines he offers for sale are sold or compounded, as the ease may…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mayor of Dublin v. DudleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fryer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  2. State v. LevineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API