Legal Opinion
Frame v. Hunter, MacLean, Exley & Dunn, P.C.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 4, 1999No. A97A0446PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McMurray, Presiding Judge.
In Frame v. Hunter, Maclean, Exley & Dunn, P.C., 227 Ga. App. 169 (488 SE2d 713), we reversed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in this legal malpractice action, holding that Hunter, Maclean, Exley & Dunn, P.C.’s (“the firm”) continued relationship after withdrawing as Christopher Frame’s and Rosemary Frame’s long-time family lawyer, while assuring the Frames that they would not suffer damages as a result of the firm’s alleged malpractice, would authorize a finding that the statute of limitation was tolled. Id. at 171 (1), supra. The Supreme Court of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hunter, MacLean, Exley & Dunn, P.C. v. FrameSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Prince v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Layfield v. SanfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- General Communications Service, Inc. v. Georgia Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Martin v. HeardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- ESI Companies, Inc. v. Fulton CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- City of Lawrenceville v. Ricoh Electronics, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2005
- Frame v. Hunter, MacLean, Exley & Dunn, P.C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- HAMBRIC STEEL AND FABRICATION INC v. LEEBCOR SERVICES LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2022