Legal Opinion

Layfield v. Sanford

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 27, 1981No. 36840PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marshall, Justice.

This is a suit for reformation of a deed and damages. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, but the trial judge granted the defendants’ motion for judgment n.o.v. The plaintiffs appeal.

The plaintiffs are W. E. and Elizabeth E. Layfield, who are husband and wife. Defendant Albert A. Sanford is their nephew. Through a series of transactions, the plaintiffs acquired title to Lot 8 of Block A in Vincent Heights Subdivision in Milledgeville, Georgia. This property was the homeplace of Mary Ella and Albert F. Sanford, who were the defendant’s parents, Mary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gibson v. AlfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  2. Green v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Scurry v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. A. J. Concrete Pumping, Inc. v. Richard O'Brien Equipment Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  2. First Nat. Bank of Polk County v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Lee v. American Central InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. Ready Trucking, Inc. v. BP Exploration & Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Haffner v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API