Legal Opinion

Antoine D. Bates v. State of Indiana

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 2017No. Court of Appeals Case 20A03-1612-CR-2896PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vaidik, Chief Judge.

Case Summary

At Antoine D. Bates’s jury trial for Class B felony burglary, the State disclosed for the first time that a wallet (which the owner had lost over two years earlier) had been found in the area of the burglary. Bates argued that this late disclosure violated Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), which requires the prosecution to disclose evidence that is favorable to the defendant. The trial court found no Brady violation, and Bates was convicted as charged. Bates now appeals, arguing a Brady violation and that the evidence is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Cone v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Drane v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Baker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jabreeh Cash Davis-Martin v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Brenton E. Barnhill v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API