Antoine D. Bates v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Vaidik, Chief Judge.
Case Summary
At Antoine D. Bates’s jury trial for Class B felony burglary, the State disclosed for the first time that a wallet (which the owner had lost over two years earlier) had been found in the area of the burglary. Bates argued that this late disclosure violated Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), which requires the prosecution to disclose evidence that is favorable to the defendant. The trial court found no Brady violation, and Bates was convicted as charged. Bates now appeals, arguing a Brady violation and that the evidence is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Cone v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Drane v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Baker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jabreeh Cash Davis-Martin v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
- Brenton E. Barnhill v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019