Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hassebroch v. Weaver Construction Company

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 14, 1954No. 48614Published

1DissentMulroney, J.

(dissenting) — I respectfully dissent. The majority opinion does not exactly state there was m> dispute in the evidence but it mentions none. And I can only read the *635forepart of tbe majority opinion as holding the commissioner’s finding that claimant’s decedent was an independent contractor was a finding of fact. The statute (section 86.29, Code, 1954) and so much case authority is cited to support the familiar rule that the commissioner’s finding of fact is conclusive, that I assume the majority is holding no question of law was presented for review and the commissioner’s finding that…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Pace v. Appanoose CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  2. Butler v. . TownsendNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Tuttle v. Embury-Martin Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Bowen v. Gradison Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API