Legal Opinion

Drainage District No. 2 v. Ada County

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1924PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCARTIiY, C. J.

— The complaint in this case contains four causes of action. Cross-appellant is a drainage district situate in appellant, Ada county. Under the statutes applicable appellant’s treasurer and ex-ojficio tax collector *781collected certain assesments levied by cross-appellant. In the first canse of action cross-appellant seeks to recover $1,639.43, which it alleges the said county treasurer deducted from the proceeds of assessments levied by cross-appellant and paid over to appellant as a collection fee or charge. A demurrer interposed by appellant to this cause of action was overruled. In the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rhoda v. Alameda Cty.California Supreme Court · 1877
  2. State v. JutilaIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  3. First National Bank v. Custer CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Village of Mountainhome v. Elmore CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Biron v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Local 1494 of the International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of Coeur D'AleneIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Pomona City School District v. PayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. HaworthIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Poston v. HollarIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Board of Com'rs of Rogers County v. BaxterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API