Legal Opinion
Neal v. Xerox Corp.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided January 15, 1998No. Civ.A. 2:97CV553PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CLARKE, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant Xerox Corporation’s (“Xerox”) Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Stay Discovery and plaintiff Nancy J. Neal’s Motions for Sanctions. Ms. Neal appeared pro se and Xerox appeared through counsel at a hearing on December 22, 1997, to argue Xerox’s two motions. Immediately following the hearing, Ms. Neal filed two Motions for Sanctions against Xerox’s counsel. For the reasons that follow, Xerox’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, Xerox’s Motion to Stay Discovery is MOOT, and Ms. Neal’s Motions for Sanctions are…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Roach v. Option One Mortgage Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
- Skidmore v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2002
- Lopez Baez v. Sears Roebuck Corp.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2000
- Birdsong v. City of MemphisDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2003
- Abdul-Musawir Williams v. Newport News School BoardDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.