Legal Opinion

People v. Wilson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 4, 2004No. 4-03-0113PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Steigmann

Defendant, Howard Wilson, appeals the trial court’s second-stage dismissal of his second postconviction petition, arguing that (1) he was denied his right to conflict-free counsel in postconviction proceedings; and (2) his felony murder conviction should be reversed because the statute of limitations for the underlying felony had expired prior to the State’s charging him. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

In July 1992, the State charged defendant with (1) three counts of first degree murder, alleging, in pertinent part, that on or about October 27, 1988, he killed Scott Alan Burton, Robert J. Webb, and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. SpreitzerIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. GrahamIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. HoltIllinois Supreme Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. SealsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. People v. WalesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  3. People v. PattersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  4. People v. PhillipsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2022
  5. People v. PattersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API