Legal Opinion

Fruehauf Division, Fruehauf Corp. v. Boyle

New York County Courts

Decided July 31, 1975PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArnold W. Proskin, J.

This matter having come before the court by an order to show cause and argument having been heard at an adjourned Special Term of court, it is the determination of the court that no relief may be granted to movant Boyle, because this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the matter which the movant seeks stayed.

The facts are uncomplicated. Movant Boyle owned a truck which required repairs. He took it to respondent Fruehaufs repair shop where, according to the papers before me, substantial work was done. When the time to pay arrived, however, disputes arose as to the authority of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Collesion v. Collesion, New York County Courts1955
  2. Backo v. Watrous, New York County Courts1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. St. Johnland Nursing Home, Inc. v. Perlman, New York County Courts1987
  2. Michalski v. Noah Home Improvement & Construction Corp., New York County Courts1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API