Legal Opinion

Collesion v. Collesion

New York County Courts

Decided December 20, 1955PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge A. Brenner, J.

Plaintiff moves under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice for an order striking out defendant’s answer, and for summary judgment upon a complaint which sets out two causes of action.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff had previously sued defendant in the Supreme Court (the nature of which action does not appear), that the action was settled by stipulation in writing dated May 19, 1953, to the effect that the rents, income, profits and disbursements of certain realty should be received by defendant in the first instance, who would pay for repairs, taxes, insurance and the like, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Quackenbos v. . SayerNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Rubenstein v. SmallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947
  3. Thomas v. . HarmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Tyndall v. . Pinelawn CemeteryNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. Armstrong v. ShapiroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Karnes Enterprises, Inc. v. QuanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  2. Weiser v. Burick, New York County Courts1965
  3. Fruehauf Division, Fruehauf Corp. v. Boyle, New York County Courts1975
  4. Gloversville Shopping Center, Inc., New York County Courts1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API